Feyenoord Vs Shakhtar: Player Ratings & Performance Analysis

Nov 3, 2025 by Admin 61 views

Let's dive into a detailed player ratings and performance analysis from the exciting Feyenoord vs. Shakhtar match! This breakdown will give you the lowdown on who shone, who struggled, and the key moments that defined each player's contribution to the game. We'll examine individual performances, tactical decisions, and overall impact on the match's outcome. Whether you're a die-hard Feyenoord fan, a Shakhtar supporter, or just a football enthusiast, this analysis will provide valuable insights into the game.

Feyenoord Player Ratings

Alright, Feyenoord fans, let's break down how your team performed, player by player. We'll look at the starters and key substitutes, giving each a rating and a quick analysis of their contribution.

Goalkeeper

Justin Bijlow: Rating: 7/10. Bijlow had a solid game, making a few crucial saves to keep Shakhtar at bay. His distribution was generally good, and he commanded his area well. However, there were a couple of nervy moments where his decision-making could have been better. Overall, a reliable performance.

Defenders

Marcus Pedersen: Rating: 6.5/10. Pedersen was energetic down the right flank, providing a good outlet in attack. Defensively, he was mostly sound, but he did get caught out of position a few times, allowing Shakhtar to exploit the space. His crossing accuracy could also improve.
Gernot Trauner: Rating: 7.5/10. Trauner was a rock at the back, winning headers, making tackles, and organizing the defense. His experience and leadership were vital in keeping Shakhtar's attack relatively quiet. A commanding performance from the captain.
David Hancko: Rating: 7/10. Hancko partnered well with Trauner, showing composure and aerial ability. He was strong in the tackle and read the game well, making several important interceptions. His passing was also accurate, helping Feyenoord build from the back.
Quilindschy Hartman: Rating: 6/10. Hartman had a mixed game. He showed flashes of brilliance going forward, but defensively, he struggled against Shakhtar's wingers. He needs to improve his positioning and awareness to become a more complete full-back.

Midfielders

Mats Wieffer: Rating: 7/10. Wieffer was a tireless worker in midfield, breaking up plays and winning the ball back for Feyenoord. His energy and commitment were crucial in disrupting Shakhtar's rhythm. He also played some neat passes to keep the ball moving.
Orkun Kökcü: Rating: 8/10. Kökcü was the standout performer in midfield, dictating the tempo and creating chances for his teammates. His passing range was excellent, and he showed great vision and creativity. He also scored a beautiful goal, showcasing his technique and composure.
Sebastian Szymański: Rating: 6.5/10. Szymański had a decent game, contributing with his energy and work rate. He pressed well and made some good runs, but his final product was lacking at times. He needs to be more clinical in front of goal to become a more consistent threat.

Forwards

Alireza Jahanbakhsh: Rating: 6/10. Jahanbakhsh worked hard but didn't have a significant impact on the game. He struggled to get past his marker and didn't create many chances. He needs to be more decisive and assertive in the final third.
Santiago Giménez: Rating: 7/10. Giménez led the line well, holding up the ball and bringing others into play. He scored a crucial goal, showing his predatory instincts in the box. He also worked tirelessly, pressing the Shakhtar defense.
Igor Paixão: Rating: 6.5/10. Paixão showed glimpses of his talent, with his pace and trickery causing problems for the Shakhtar defense. However, he was inconsistent and needs to improve his decision-making in the final third.

Substitutes

Patrik Wålemark: Rating: 6/10. Wålemark came on and added some energy to the attack but didn't have a significant impact.
Danilo: Rating: 6/10. Danilo replaced Giménez late in the game but didn't have much time to make an impact.
Oussama Idrissi: Rating: N/A. Idrissi came on too late to be rated.

Shakhtar Player Ratings

Now, let's switch gears and analyze the Shakhtar Donetsk players. We'll assess their individual performances and see how they contributed to their team's efforts.

Goalkeeper

Anatoliy Trubin: Rating: 6.5/10. Trubin made a few good saves but was ultimately beaten by Feyenoord's quality. His distribution was decent, but he didn't command his area as effectively as Bijlow.

Defenders

Lucas Taylor: Rating: 5.5/10. Taylor struggled against Feyenoord's attack, getting caught out of position and failing to contain their wingers. He needs to improve his defensive awareness and tackling.
Mykola Matviyenko: Rating: 6/10. Matviyenko was the better of the two center-backs, making some important clearances and interceptions. However, he was still vulnerable against Feyenoord's pace and power.
Valeriy Bondar: Rating: 5/10. Bondar had a difficult game, making several mistakes that led to Feyenoord chances. He struggled to cope with Giménez's physicality and movement.
Bogdan Mykhaylichenko: Rating: 6/10. Mykhaylichenko was solid defensively but didn't offer much going forward. He needs to be more adventurous and contribute more to the attack.

Midfielders

Taras Stepanenko: Rating: 6.5/10. Stepanenko was a warrior in midfield, battling for every ball and trying to disrupt Feyenoord's play. However, he was often outnumbered and struggled to contain their creativity.
Artem Bondarenko: Rating: 6/10. Bondarenko showed some flashes of quality but was inconsistent overall. He needs to improve his decision-making and consistency to become a more influential player.
Heorhii Sudakov: Rating: 7/10. Sudakov was one of Shakhtar's better players, showing his skill and creativity in midfield. He created some chances for his teammates and was always looking to make things happen.

Forwards

Oleksandr Zubkov: Rating: 6/10. Zubkov worked hard but didn't have a significant impact on the game. He struggled to get past his marker and didn't create many chances.
Lassina Traoré: Rating: 5.5/10. Traoré was isolated upfront and didn't get much service. He struggled to hold up the ball and didn't pose much of a threat to the Feyenoord defense.
Dmytro Kryskiv: Rating: 6/10. Kryskiv showed some promise but was ultimately ineffective. He needs to improve his finishing and decision-making in the final third.

Substitutes

Ivan Petriak: Rating: 6/10. Petriak came on and added some energy to the attack but didn't have a significant impact.
Neven Djurasek: Rating: N/A. Djurasek came on too late to be rated.
Danylo Sikan: Rating: N/A. Sikan came on too late to be rated.

Key Takeaways and Tactical Analysis

Alright, folks, let's wrap things up with some key takeaways and a bit of tactical analysis from the Feyenoord vs. Shakhtar match. We'll look at the main strategies employed by both teams, the crucial moments that shifted the game's momentum, and the overall tactical battle that unfolded on the pitch.

Feyenoord's Dominance in Midfield

Feyenoord's midfield, led by the exceptional Orkun Kökcü, dominated the game. Their ability to control possession, dictate the tempo, and create scoring opportunities was a key factor in their victory. Mats Wieffer's tireless work rate and Sebastian Szymański's energy complemented Kökcü's creativity, making Feyenoord's midfield a force to be reckoned with. Shakhtar struggled to cope with their movement and passing, often finding themselves chasing shadows.

The central midfield trio of Kokcu, Weiffer, and Szymanski proved too hot to handle for Shakhtar. They could barely string passes together without being dispossessed or hurried. Feyenoord were quick in the press and it won them many opportunities in the game. Feyenoord's dominance started from the back and the midfield just capitalized on the great plays.

Shakhtar's Defensive Struggles

Shakhtar's defense had a difficult time containing Feyenoord's attack. They were often caught out of position, struggled to deal with Giménez's physicality, and failed to contain Feyenoord's wingers. Bondar, in particular, had a tough game, making several mistakes that led to scoring chances. Shakhtar needs to improve their defensive organization and communication to be more competitive in future matches.

Shakhtar's defensive frailties were exposed, especially down the flanks. They couldn't contain the runs of Paixão and Jahanbakhsh, leading to numerous crosses into the box. Their center-backs also struggled to deal with Giménez's aerial presence and clever movement. Better organization and communication are needed if they hope to advance further in the competition.

Feyenoord's Attacking Prowess

Feyenoord's attack was sharp and clinical, creating numerous scoring opportunities and taking their chances well. Giménez led the line effectively, while Kökcü's creativity and Paixão's pace added another dimension to their attack. Feyenoord's ability to score goals from different sources makes them a dangerous opponent for any team.

Feyenoord's attacking players demonstrated great skill, movement, and finishing ability. Giménez's goal was a testament to his predatory instincts, while Kökcü's strike showcased his technique and composure. Their ability to create chances from open play and set-pieces makes them a formidable attacking force. The manager will be very happy with the number of goals the team created in the game.

Shakhtar's Lack of Creativity

Shakhtar struggled to create clear-cut scoring opportunities, relying mainly on individual moments of brilliance. Their lack of creativity in midfield and their inability to break down Feyenoord's defense hampered their chances of getting back into the game. Sudakov was one of the few bright spots, but he couldn't do it all on his own.

Shakhtar's attacking players lacked the spark and creativity needed to unlock Feyenoord's defense. They struggled to string passes together in the final third and often resorted to hopeful long balls. The absence of a true playmaker was evident, and they need to find a way to create more chances if they want to be competitive.

The Impact of Substitutions

Feyenoord's substitutions didn't have a significant impact on the game, as they were mainly aimed at preserving their lead and resting key players. Shakhtar's substitutions, on the other hand, added some energy to their attack, but they couldn't change the outcome of the match.

Overall, the Feyenoord vs. Shakhtar match was a captivating encounter that showcased Feyenoord's dominance in midfield and their clinical finishing. Shakhtar struggled to cope with Feyenoord's attacking prowess and lacked the creativity to break down their defense. The match provided valuable insights into both teams' strengths and weaknesses, and it will be interesting to see how they perform in their upcoming games.

That's all for the player ratings and performance analysis from the Feyenoord vs. Shakhtar match! Hope you guys enjoyed the read and gained some valuable insights into the game. Keep following for more football analysis and updates!